Rationale
Objectives
Virginia Standards of Learning
Readings
Instructional Sets:
Rationale
The message of the story is to work hard, do the "right" thing, and be thankful for everything you get in return. Collectively, we have always considered this a nice story and a healthy lesson for children to learn. The problem is this story never happenned. It's a romanticized version of a few Puritans' experience that has somehow come to suppress the real and various experiences of colonial America. Take a moment to visit the following websites, in order: The First
Thanksgiving
As you move from one site to the next, it becomes more and more clear that the story we teach our children as "history" is at best a legend. What motivates us to so readily accept such a story as history? What would it mean to learn a more "realistic" story in the first place? The students didn't realize that the book was showing them an unrealistic stereotype of both Native Americans and Puritans. They didn't realize that there were female Native Americans, because there were no female Native Americans in the book. Several white students in the class didn't understand how Native Americans were different from African Americans. The only history they were learning, "their history," was in fact a legend of an impossible ideal, a legend they were asked to see themselves in, though most of them probably did not or could not. The day I substitute taught that first grade class I thought of my own experience as a young student of American history. It was so difficult for me, as a student, to imagine these Puritan people in the books! How could they be so different from the people who live today? Did they ever have fun? Did they laugh? Did they go to the bathroom? What did they eat? I also imagined the one African-American student in the class and how he may have felt as we looked at such flawless representations of Puritan people, the very same people who enslaved African people and questioned whether they had souls! How good is a curriculum that asks the students it educates to associate themselves with the "white" Pilgrims, participants in history, or the "non-white" other? I can't offer solutions to problem of the first grade curriculum (though our students will!)-- but the problem that remains, a huge problem, is that most of us never truly see beyond the formative myths of first grade when we look at our country's history. We don't see the complicated, plural experience our country was and always has been. We see the paper-bag Puritan projects that we made in first grade, with stuffed bellies and a row of buttons, clean black hats, round white paper faces and a choice of two hair colors: brown or blond. We don't see the real human experience. We also don't see all the humans. We see a governing white man and perhaps his relation of the good wife and children behind him. We don't see the colonists who were ostracized and often executed for deviating from the Puritan ideal.. We don't see the Native Americans sharing their knowledge of the land they have known for thousands of years, being pushed off that same land, dying from European attacks and diseases. We don't see the African slaves who were forced to contributed so much of the work that made survival and prosperity possible for the colonists. James Baldwin said, in his "Talk to Teachers": If... one managed to change the curriculum in all the schools so Negroes learned more about themselves and their real contributions to this culture, you would be liberating white people who know nothing about their own history. And the reason is that if you are compelled to lie about one aspect of anybody's history, you mist lie about it all. Baldwin speaks to all of us here: telling the truth about history means becoming "sane" as a society-- starting from who each of us really is in relation to the other and in relation to our histories. Thus my goal as a teacher is to try, to the best of my ability, to give my students access to a more accurate representation of the early colonial settlements, a perspective that includes more of the real people who lived among each other in the settlements and continue to live among each other, in the same country, today. Some people think that looking at our history from this perspective is "unpatriotic" or "makes white people look bad." Certainly it does make English and European-American people look "worse" than they look in the traditional history books where they are the heroes, but it also makes them look real. In some ways it's that concept, the concept of worse and better, bad and good, and our need to see ourselves always on the side of "good," that is the problem. None of history is as simple as "right" and "wrong," "good" and bad". Acknowledging the imperfect, painful, and at moments promising, reality of our history while continuing to work "for liberty and justice for all" seems to me the key to becoming an honest, compassionate citizen in both reflection and action. |
Let America Be America Again
by Langston Hughes
Let America be America again.
(America never was America to me.)
Let America be the dream the dreamers dreamed--
(It never was America to me.)
O, let my land be a land where Liberty
(There's never been equality for me,
Say, who are you that mumbles in the dark?
I am the poor white, fooled and pushed apart,
I am the young man, full of strength and hope,
I am the farmer, bondsman to the soil.
Yet I'm the one who dreamt our basic dream
The free?
Who said the free? Not me?
O, let America be America again--
Sure, call me any ugly name you choose--
O, yes,
Out of the rack and ruin of our gangster death,
From The Collected Poems of Langston Hughes published
by Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. Copyright © 1994 the Estate of Langston Hughes.
Used without permission.
|
The founders of one of America's "Democratic Schools" define the "ideal
citizen" as one who possesses "empathy and skepticism: the ability to see
a situation from the eyes of another and the tendency to wonder about the
validity of what we encounter." (Meier and Schwartz, 1995) The school
cultivates those qualities in their students by asking them to habitually
ask these five questions:
1. How do you know what you know?
2. From whose viewpoint is this being presented?
3. How is this event or work connected to others?
4. What if things were different?
5. Why is this important?
I would add the question, "Whose viewpoint is not represented and how might they interpret the subject?"
Questions like these prevent "future shock"-- what occurs when you are confronted by the fact that the world you were educated to believe in doesn't exist" (Postman, 1969)
With those ideas in mind, I tried to collect period literature and documents that might better represent the multiple perspectives of the colonial experience. That was very difficult because, as we know, history is written by the victors. The documents I have chosen still overwhelmingly represent the perspectives of ruling class English men. There are, to the best of my knowledge, no primary sources from Native American peoples or slaves during this time; but that doesn't mean we can't learn literature before 1700 in a multicultural context. Multicultural education isn't only content integration, which would be very difficult during this time period in America. It is also about how knowledge is constructed (Banks, 1993). Through the literatures and documents we do have, we can use critical readings skills to understand the investments of the author in a certain "reality" and to infer the possible experiences of the "others" the author mentions. A lot of the "others" of society-- women, slaves, servants, natives-- live between the lines of the ruling class literatures. There may not be autobiographical documents for their lives, but their undocumented lives were as real as the documented ones.
My commitment as a learner and teacher is to listen to and understand all of those lives as equally important, and to show students how to do the same. This may sound like a ridiculous statment, but our marginalization of non-European cultures and peoples is often hidden behind an empty rhetoric of freedom and opportunity. Take a moment to read the poem above by Langston Hughes, "Let America Be America Again." Hughes's poem shatters any perception we may want to cling to that America is a land where "opportunity is real, and life is free,/ equality is in the air we breathe." But it is not without hope-- it calls us to bring together the historic America and the dreamed America into one entity-- a real America that really is a land of freedom and equality.
Of course, the question of how to do that has just about as many answers as there are people. The words "freedom" and "equality" are loaded words; they mean different things to different people. To a gay and lesbian rights activist, or to a feminist activist, freedom may sound like this:
Until all children are free to realize their full potential, until all women and men are free from the stigma, threats, alienation, or violence that come from stepping outside their roles, we are all at risk.
For June Jordan, who has experienced systematic racism through her
entire life as an African American woman, freedom means something else:
Freedom...meant looking for a job and, if you found something for which you qualified-- on the basis of education and/ or experience-- being able to take that position. Freedom had to do with getting into college if your grades were good enough. Freedom meant you could register to vote and live to talk about it.
So, when we hear the rhetoric of freedom, we have to ask ourselves, "Whose freedom?" And the answer should be, "Everyone's freedom."
For America's original colonists, certainly "everyone" wasn't the answer. The motivation for and foundation of our country have been disastrously misrepresented. It's time to acknowledge that right alongside the new Puritan "freedom," African people were enslaved, Native American lives invalidated and thrown away, and of the colonists themselves, "witches" were hung, "heretics" banished, and "sodomists" executed. Certainly it is no illusion that many Americans still take of pride in sharing the ideals of those original colonists. They are invested in the legend, in the ideal, the "land that never has been." But the legend blocks out the destructive results and the unpleasant circumstances that accompany those ideals and their limitations. Embedded in those ideologies and their literatures are the roots of the inequality and injustice our country still suffers from.
Literature can act as a balance to the victor's history. In developing this curriculum for American Literature before 1700, I have sought to include the literatures that will help students gain insight into the men who professed the Puritan ideal, how their application of that ideal affected the people who weren't included among the Elect, and the writings of those who departed from that ideal. Specifically, we will look at perceptions of race and gender in Puritan culture and how those perceptions have shaped our society today.
The real content of this curriculum project is its content.
I have suggested methods and activities for engaging the text, as well
as possible activities, projects and papers for the evaluation of student
learning. These, however, can and should be altered and embelished
upon to best suit the needs and style of your students. The priority
should be to engage your students at the critical level-- to help
them understand the literature in the context of history, power, and perspective.
11.3 The student will read a American literature, history, and culture.
and analyze relationships among
optional readings:
Collaboration:
Papers and Projects (general topics and ideas):